Order Report
Compare candidate sites, estimate site and energy demand, and organize development risks into one seven-module planning report—with assumptions, source evidence, and next actions.
Screen up to 20 submitted parcels through one consistent planning-grade workflow before committing deeper diligence effort to a single site.
Compare submitted sites using estimated area demand, stated acreage, source availability and outstanding confirmations. The comparison supports your shortlist decision; it does not verify buildability.
Use each detailed analysis run to advance a shortlisted parcel or scenario into the coordinated feasibility package covering site fit, utilities, code/fire exposure, cooling/water/noise, constructability, cost, schedule, and risk.
Review transparent area allowances for the building, support yards, circulation, stormwater and expansion. The proportional diagram illustrates quantities; a surveyed parcel test-fit and architectural site plan require separate design work.
Receive seven planning modules, calculation tables, an area-budget diagram, an evidence register and a risk/action register. Page count follows the available evidence and findings.
Scenario calculations translate target IT load into facility power, rack count, floor area and support-yard demand. Submitted acreage and explicit allowances establish an estimated area budget; parcel geometry is not verified.
The coordinated modules organize power and utility exposure, zoning/building/fire-code prompts, cooling/water/noise strategy, materials and constructability direction, and planning-level cost/schedule/risk findings.
Clearly separate calculated planning outputs from utility, civil, environmental, geotechnical, code, fire, cost, schedule, permitting, and other items that require qualified external confirmation.
Receive the final digital report package for internal review, acquisition discussion, consultant scoping, and next-step professional due diligence.
Report pricing
Each report compares up to 20 candidate sites, then provides a full seven-module planning-grade feasibility report and downloadable PDF for one selected site.
One-time payment · USD before applicable taxes · No automatic renewal
Scroll across to compare packages on smaller screens.
| One-time packages | Single$1,500one time | RecommendedProfessional$4,000one time | Portfolio$7,500one time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detailed reports included | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Candidate sites per report | Up to 20 | Up to 20 | Up to 20 |
| Request access | Request Single | Request Professional | Request Portfolio |
Included with every report: comparison of up to 20 candidate sites, one selected site's seven-module planning-grade feasibility study, an evidence and assumptions register, and a PDF download.
Clear analysis boundaries
Quantified operating and embodied carbon, tariff-based operating costs, heat-reuse economics, and integrated alternative ranking are not included as validated calculations in the standard report.
These require local emissions factors, equipment performance, tariffs, material quantities, heat demand, and independent technical review. No carbon reduction, savings, or heat-sale revenue is guaranteed.
What you receive
Move from candidate comparison to a coordinated site analysis, with documented assumptions and next steps.
Scope
Compare submitted candidate sites using one consistent planning-grade screening framework before advancing one location.
Selected site
Each detailed run evaluates one selected site and one set of assumptions, with a coordinated DCFR report and handoff package.
Report depth
The current report includes all seven modules, an area-budget diagram, calculations, source evidence and a risk register. Length varies with content; no fixed page count is promised.
Delivery status
Requests run in the background. Your workspace shows queued, running, completed or failed status. Processing depends on candidate count, source availability and supplied inputs.
Planning-grade decision support — not final engineering or permit documentation.
Automated SaaS delivery
Complete the project questionnaire with the information you have. DCFR uses those inputs and supported public sources to calculate planning scenarios, record unresolved constraints and assemble the report package.
Reports are software-generated. No human professional review or live consultation is included in the standard purchase. The output is planning-grade decision support and must be independently verified before acquisition, design, permitting, financing, or construction decisions.
Seven coordinated modules
Each module contributes calculations, diagrams, findings, assumptions, and next-step actions to the selected-site report.
01
Compare up to 20 submitted candidates using area scenarios, candidate-specific source findings, unresolved risks, and confirmation priorities.
Representative outputs
Candidate area comparison · source coverage · missing-input flags · confirmation priorities
02
Record available local jurisdiction and map evidence and organize permitted-use, adopted-code, fire-access, equipment-separation, and approval questions. Parcel-wide applicability requires confirmation.
Representative outputs
Available district-map evidence · zoning/use and code prompts · access and equipment-separation questions · AHJ confirmation checklist
03
Calculate facility demand and annual energy, classify the proposed power pathway and its maturity, reconcile capacity claims, and track delivery, permit, commercial, and energization dependencies.
Representative outputs
Facility demand · annual energy · electrical / generator yard allowances · utility capacity and energization confirmation items
04
Compare annual energy and onsite water when PUE and WUE inputs are supplied. Retain environmental evidence and identify peak cooling, water/sewer, discharge, and acoustic studies still required.
Representative outputs
Annual PUE/WUE scenarios when supplied · cooling-yard allowance · environmental evidence and gaps · water/sewer and acoustic confirmation items
05
Estimate an area-based IT-capacity range or program area budget using submitted acreage and stated assumptions. Preserve parcel and assemblage conflicts; physical geometry and buildability require confirmation.
Representative outputs
Area-based capacity range or proportional area-budget diagram · support-yard and reserve allowances · parcel / assemblage holds · physical-fit confirmation items
06
Frame floor-count, structural, ground-condition, envelope, delivery, and equipment-replacement questions. A reviewed assembly library and physical option validation remain separate work.
Representative outputs
Floor-count assumptions · structural and envelope review questions · delivery, laydown, crane, and equipment-replacement inputs needed
07
Calculate scoped costs from dated quantities and rates, and dependency durations, float, and critical tasks when inputs are supplied. Retain unpriced scope, unknown durations, open risks, and next actions.
Representative outputs
Dated scoped cost lines when supplied · dependency durations, float, and critical tasks when supplied · unpriced scope and unknown durations · risk / action record
Basis of analysis
DCFR combines submitted site inputs, visible site/context conditions, rule-based planning logic, and transparent assumptions to produce an early feasibility judgment.
01
Candidate addresses, parcel links, target program intent, and submitted site information.
02
Supported official data services are queried where location and coverage permit. Unavailable sources and unresolved local records remain explicitly flagged.
03
Area-budget scenarios, MW-to-area demand, support-yard allowances, circulation, stormwater and expansion calculations.
04
Early-stage allowances for data hall geometry, electrical and generator yards, cooling, fuel, fire access, and security.
05
Utility, civil, code, environmental, legal, MEP, cost, schedule, and authority items that require qualified external confirmation.
DCFR is planning-grade decision support. Final engineering, stamped drawings, utility capacity, zoning interpretation, environmental studies, civil design, geotechnical conditions, acoustics, cost, schedule, permit path, and authority approvals require confirmation by qualified external professionals and authorities.
Delivery FAQ
Start screening or a selected-site report from your project workspace. Processing runs in the background, with status and completed downloads available under Reports. Timing depends on the submitted sites and external source availability; a fixed delivery time is not guaranteed.
The report includes seven planning modules, calculation and assumption records, an area-budget diagram, source evidence and open risks/actions. Page count varies with evidence and findings. The sample illustrates the format and does not establish a fixed deliverable length.
No human professional review is included in the standard digital product. The report is generated through DCFR’s standardized software workflow using submitted project information, rule-based planning logic, calculations, and documented assumptions. DCFR reflects architect-led domain knowledge, but the generated report is not stamped, sealed, permit-ready, or a substitute for licensed architectural, engineering, legal, environmental, utility, or authority review.
The report is planning-grade and intended to support early go / no-go decisions, site comparison, acquisition discussion, internal review, consultant scoping, and handoff. It is not final engineering, construction documentation, a utility commitment, entitlement approval, environmental clearance, or permit documentation.
Ready to get started
Use the standardized DCFR workflow to screen up to 20 candidate sites, then generate a seven-module planning report for a selected site. Track processing in your workspace and download the report when ready. Source gaps and required external confirmations remain visible.
